<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mr Blog &#187; gizmo5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/tag/gizmo5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If OpenSky proves the market, will Skype cherry pick?</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/if-opensky-proves-the-market-will-skype-cherry-pick/</link>
		<comments>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/if-opensky-proves-the-market-will-skype-cherry-pick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.org/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft created quite a reputation for letting third-party developers build apps and then either purchasing the company or copying and driving out of business those that were most successful. Skype has said they aren&#8217;t opening their network because their customers haven&#8217;t asked for it.  Is that the truth, or is that just a convenient excuse? If Gizmo5&#8242;s OpenSky proves there is a market for SIP to Skype, will Skype &#8220;cherry pick&#8221; that app and build that feature into their service?  Or if Gizmo5 shows there is demand for it, perhaps they still won&#8217;t do it because maybe it&#8217;s not really about business &#8211; maybe it&#8217;s about religion, the church of Skype.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft created quite a reputation for letting third-party developers build apps and then either purchasing the company or copying and driving out of business those that were most successful.</p>
<p>Skype has said they aren&#8217;t opening their network because their customers haven&#8217;t asked for it.  Is that the truth, or is that just a convenient excuse?</p>
<p>If <a href="http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/michael-robertson-moves-beyond-skype-openclosed-debate/">Gizmo5&#8242;s OpenSky</a> proves there is a market for SIP to Skype, will Skype &#8220;cherry pick&#8221; that app and build that feature into their service?  Or if Gizmo5 shows there is demand for it, perhaps they still won&#8217;t do it because maybe it&#8217;s not really about business &#8211; maybe it&#8217;s about religion, the church of Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/if-opensky-proves-the-market-will-skype-cherry-pick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Robertson moves beyond Skype open/closed debate</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/michael-robertson-moves-beyond-skype-openclosed-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/michael-robertson-moves-beyond-skype-openclosed-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.org/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than bicker over what &#8220;open&#8221; means and whether Skype is open or not, Michael Robertson has just ignored the whole thing and taken action instead. Today, Gizmo5 launched OpenSky, a SIP to Skype gateway. if you want to call a Skype user named echo123 you simply call SIP address  sip:echo123@opensky.gizmo5.com The free version can be used by anyone for calls up to 5 minutes long. For longer calls, you need to use their paid service, which is $20 per year for individuals. I guess this will test Skype&#8217;s claim that no one is asking for this service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than bicker over what &#8220;open&#8221; means and whether Skype is open or not, Michael Robertson has just ignored the whole thing and taken action instead.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.gizmo5.com/pc/opensky/images/opensky_logo.png" alt="OpenSky" /></p>
<p>Today, Gizmo5 launched <a title="OpenSky" href="http://www.gizmo5.com/pc/opensky/" target="_blank"><strong>OpenSky</strong></a>, a SIP to Skype gateway.  if you want to call a Skype user named <strong>echo123</strong> you simply call SIP address  sip:<em>echo123</em>@opensky.gizmo5.com</p>
<p>The free version can be used by anyone for calls up to 5 minutes long. For longer calls, you need to use their paid service, which is $20 per year for individuals.</p>
<p>I guess this will test Skype&#8217;s claim that no one is asking for this service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrblog.org/2009/02/10/michael-robertson-moves-beyond-skype-openclosed-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

