Mr Blog... Mr Blog... Log on to Mr Blog... Blogging website.

"The blog is named in honor of a TV ad jingle for a certain Chinese fast-food chain here in the San Francisco Bay area, particularly well-known in the Silicon Valley."
RSS Subscribe to RSS

Diversion: SF Giants 2009 HDTV games

I put a schedule like this together for 2008 and I’ve seen a number of hits looking for a 2009 version. Sorry for the delay folks, but here it is.

Once again, I combined data from the SF Giants site “broadcast schedule” and the Comcast Sports Net Bay Area site “Giants schedule” to produce a list of all games planned to be broadcast in HD this year. It assumes NBC and FOX are available in hi-def.

A ZIP file containing a CSV and ICS calendar can be downloaded here: hdgames2009.zip

Date Time (PT) Opponent Channel
05/15/2009 07:15 PM Mets at Giants NBC
05/16/2009 01:10 PM Mets at Giants FOX
05/17/2009 05:00 PM Mets at Giants ESPN
05/19/2009 07:05 PM Giants at Padres CSN
05/20/2009 07:05 PM Giants at Padres CSN
05/21/2009 07:05 PM Giants at Padres CSN
05/22/2009 07:10 PM Giants at Mariners NBC
05/24/2009 01:10 PM Giants at Mariners CSN
05/25/2009 01:05 PM Braves at Giants CSN
05/27/2009 07:15 PM Braves at Giants CSN
05/29/2009 07:15 PM Cardinals at Giants NBC
05/30/2009 06:05 PM Cardinals at Giants CSN
05/31/2009 01:05 PM Cardinals at Giants CSN
06/10/2009 06:40 PM Giants at Diamondbacks CSN
06/12/2009 07:15 PM Athletics at Giants CSN
06/13/2009 07:05 PM Athletics at Giants NBC
06/14/2009 01:05 PM Athletics at Giants CSN
06/15/2009 07:15 PM Angels at Giants CSN
06/16/2009 07:15 PM Angels at Giants CSN
06/17/2009 12:45 PM Angels at Giants CSN
06/19/2009 07:15 PM Rangers at Giants CSN
06/20/2009 06:05 PM Rangers at Giants NBC
06/21/2009 01:05 PM Rangers at Giants CSN
06/22/2009 07:05 PM Giants at Athletics NBC
06/24/2009 07:05 PM Giants at Athletics CSN
06/29/2009 05:15 PM Giants at Cardinals CSN
06/30/2009 05:15 PM Giants at Cardinals CSN
07/01/2009 05:15 PM Giants at Cardinals CSN
07/03/2009 07:15 PM Astros at Giants NBC
07/05/2009 01:05 PM Astros at Giants CSN
07/06/2009 07:15 PM Marlins at Giants CSN
07/07/2009 07:15 PM Marlins at Giants CSN
07/09/2009 07:15 PM Padres at Giants CSN
07/10/2009 07:15 PM Padres at Giants CSN
07/11/2009 06:05 PM Padres at Giants CSN
07/12/2009 01:05 PM Padres at Giants CSN
07/24/2009 06:10 PM Giants at Rockies NBC
07/27/2009 07:15 PM Pirates at Giants CSN
07/28/2009 07:15 PM Pirates at Giants CSN
07/30/2009 07:15 PM Phillies at Giants CSN
07/31/2009 07:15 PM Phillies at Giants NBC
08/01/2009 06:05 PM Phillies at Giants CSN
08/02/2009 01:05 PM Phillies at Giants CSN
08/07/2009 07:15 PM Reds at Giants CSN
08/09/2009 01:05 PM Reds at Giants CSN
08/10/2009 07:15 PM Dodgers at Giants NBC
08/11/2009 07:15 PM Dodgers at Giants CSN
08/12/2009 12:45 PM Dodgers at Giants CSN
08/15/2009 04:10 PM Giants at Mets CSN
08/16/2009 10:10 AM Giants at Mets CSN
08/23/2009 12:10 PM Giants at Rockies CSN
08/25/2009 07:15 PM Diamondbacks at Giants NBC
08/26/2009 07:15 PM Diamondbacks at Giants CSN
08/27/2009 07:15 PM Diamondbacks at Giants CSN
08/28/2009 07:15 PM Rockies at Giants NBC
08/29/2009 06:05 PM Rockies at Giants CSN
08/30/2009 01:05 PM Rockies at Giants CSN
09/05/2009 01:05 PM Giants at Brewers FOX
09/07/2009 01:05 PM Padres at Giants CSN
09/08/2009 07:15 PM Padres at Giants CSN
09/11/2009 07:15 PM Dodgers at Giants NBC
09/12/2009 06:05 PM Dodgers at Giants NBC
09/13/2009 01:05 PM Dodgers at Giants CSN
09/15/2009 07:15 PM Rockies at Giants CSN
09/16/2009 07:15 PM Rockies at Giants CSN
09/18/2009 03:33 AM Giants at Dodgers NBC
09/19/2009 01:10 PM Giants at Dodgers FOX
09/20/2009 01:10 PM Giants at Dodgers CSN
09/22/2009 06:40 PM Giants at Diamondbacks CSN
09/24/2009 07:15 PM Cubs at Giants CSN
09/25/2009 07:15 PM Cubs at Giants CSN
09/26/2009 06:05 PM Cubs at Giants NBC
09/27/2009 01:05 PM Cubs at Giants CSN
09/29/2009 07:15 PM Diamondbacks at Giants CSN
09/30/2009 07:15 PM Diamondbacks at Giants CSN

Posted on : May 15 2009
Tags: , ,
Posted under tv |

Speaking of U-Verse

Om Malik notes a Lazard Capital Market analyst report suggesting that AT&T is having trouble signing up the 1 million “triple-play” U-verse subscribers that it promised by the end of this year.

However, we are increasingly concerned by the possibility of AT&T missing its annual projection of 1M subs, and believe that unit expectations will need to be reduced further in light of the macroeconomic environment. We believe it is more likely that AT&T will reach 30K subs per week by year-end, rather than 40K.

I realize it’s just anecdotal, but I was recently attending a street fair type event where AT&T had set up a booth trying to sell U-Verse.  The poor sales reps staffing the booth were being bombarded by irate U-Verse customers complaining about all manner of problems, mostly with the TV service and the DVR features.  These booth reps were probably outside consultants, not even AT&T employees. They most likely were getting paid on commission.  I felt sorry for them, since they obviously were having second thoughts about hitching their wagon to the U-verse horse.

It looks like AT&T may be out of their league, or at least that they underestimated the challenge of providing TV service, and how long it takes to develop a mature TV and DVR experience, and how far they are behind their competition in this area.


Posted on : Oct 13 2008
Posted under tv |

Roku Netflix Player

Well, I was going to get one of these, but now I see that it doesn’t have an interface for searching and selecting movies. You have to first log into your Netflix account and add the movie to your queue using your computer. The Roku Netflix Player only allows you to browse titles in your Netflix Instant Queue.

The other problem for me is the lack of buffer (the player only has 256MB of RAM) and reports of barely passable video quality (due to bandwidth limitations). Roku recommends a minimum 1.5Mbps connection; movies average a bit-rate of 2.2Mbps.

Macworld said:

I found the image quality underwhelming… the image looked flat, with muted colors. Some standard def content was downright blurry: the opening credits for some films and television shows were difficult to read

Now that I’ve got HDTV over satellite, the last thing I want to do is step backwards to something less than standard 480p DVD.

I’d rather wait a little while for a higher quality bitrate video to download than suffer poor video quality if my connection can’t keep up in real-time - especially for HD content (the Roku doesn’t support HD yet, but is supposed to in the future). So that means a box with a lot more RAM (or flash, or a small hard disk), which probably means it will cost more than $99.


Posted on : May 29 2008
Tags:
Posted under tv, video |

Sluggish sales for Blu-Ray DVD

Even now that the Hi-def DVD format wars are over and Blue-Ray has won, sales of the new DVD players are still sluggish. Previously, the slow sales were blamed on the assumption that consumers were waiting to see which format would dominate (survive). Now, the “experts” are finding new excuses and believe the interest will surge in another year or two.

ABI Research analyst Steve Wilson said it is just as well for consumers if they don’t jump on the Blu-ray bandwagon yet. Wilson said he expects Blu-ray players to drop to $250 by this holiday season and $200 by the end of 2009. That’s when he expects mainstream adoption of the movie format to catch on.

I wonder. Or perhaps I just flat doubt it. I think people are sick of hard media and if some kind of IP-based on-demand service, such as Apple TV, can deliver Hi-def movies and other content with sufficient quality and reliability, DVD players will be a thing of the past entirely. Heck, it might even spell the end of expensive cable and satellite TV packages where, instead, people subscribe to just a basic TV package for news and other local channels/content and use on-demand (perhaps over IP) for everything else.


Posted on : May 24 2008
Tags:
Posted under tv, video |

DirecTV reports strong Q4, but many long time customers ticked off

Last month, DirectTV reported that their profits had risen to $1 billion for the quarter ending 2007 and they reported 275,000 net subscriber additions in the US.

At the same time, there is a growing wave of customer dissatisfaction. Take, for example

I was scheduled for a free upgrade. I was told that my account would be charged $199 plus tax but the same amount would be credited. I told her that others on this forum has been promised this, but the credit was never made. She said a call back should correct the problem if it occurred. When I checked my account later, the charge was made but there was no credit. I called back and went through it again. When I was told that no free upgrade was possible despite what I was told earlier, I canceled the upgrade. As a long standing subscriber to Directv’s top programming package, I am very disappointed to be treated like this. I have wanted to believe that the horror stories I have read here were not the norm, but now I believe they are.

Or DirecTV Dumps TiVo, I Dump DirecTV:

I’ve been having various messages hit my HDTV DirecTV (DTV) TiVo (TIVO) over the course of the past month, that I’m going to need to do a required “upgrade” if I want to get my West Coast network TV channels after March 30, 2008.

Unfortunately, DirecTV’s upgrade will require me to lose my TiVo service that I love.

The upgrade is a joke. Although I’ve been relatively happy with my 4 tuner HDTV TiVo, DirecTV wants me to upgrade to a new *non TiVo* DVR that only has 2 tuners, not 4 tuners like my TiVo. It kind of sucks that they are forcing this upgrade after I spent over $1,000 on this DirecTV TiVo box originally.

My response to this forced upgrade? I just called DirecTV and canceled my service.

Sayonara DirecTV and Sayonara to your $87 a month albatross that has been hanging around my neck for the past 10 years.

Or this one:

I have a Directv branded HR10-250. Directv has been ruthlessly haranguing me with phone calls telling me I won’t get their new HD stations on it starting soon. they want to give their “free” DVR, which having had one, know for certain that I don’t want. Finally, one of the salespeople who’ve been calling broke down and told me that if I did accept their “free” DVR, that they would actually start charging me for the HD stations that I now get free (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO). So much for free. He said I am “grandfathered in” getting these free if I let things stand. But now I get a “crawl” on certain stations saying that the network HD stations are moving channels. I just want to keep the deal I have and get the HD stations I get and keep my HR-10 250.

That pretty much sums up my take on it as well. DirecTV had a perfectly reasonable service and they decided to “fix” it and here’s where it goes awry:

  1. Must lease the box - cannot buy it - adds to the monthly cost
  2. Additional fees for channels users already used to get
  3. 2-year contract - With the service going down hill, the last thing people want is to get locked up with DirecTV for two long years.

It sort of makes one think maybe we should just wait for AppleTV or some form of on-demand or IPTV. The worst part for me personally is no HD football or other sports in the mean time.


Posted on : Mar 30 2008
Tags: ,
Posted under tv |

DirecTV - all good things must come to an end

Until recently, DirecTV is one service I was mostly happy with. How many services can you say that about? Cell phone? Landline? Cable TV? Internet? When News Corp acquired DirecTV, I was worried and rightly so, it turned out; but when News Corp sold off their stake last year, I was optimistic again.

I’ve been a customer since the mid 90’s. I paid something like $1,000 for the initial setup back then. I have been a mostly happy customer all this time (even if I was “worried” at times) - but now with the forced migration to their DVR box, involving significant loss in functionality and reliability, this blissful situation may be coming to an end. Here’s what they are doing to a long-time loyal customer:

  1. Forcing me to replace my TiVo-based HD DVR with a buggy DirecTV-designed DVR with a junky remote, terrible user interface, severe limitations, and reliability problems.
  2. Forcing me into a two-year contract, even though I have been a customer for over 10 years!
  3. Charging me an additional $4.99/mo. to keep HD channels I receive now (UHD, HDNM, etc.)
  4. Charging me $20 for the unwanted swap.

I guess at this point my options are:

  1. Keep the HD TiVo and wait until DirecTV stops sending it signals it can receive.
  2. See if I can get HD Cable service with a stand-alone HD TiVo (this may not really be an option, since the cable company [Comcast] has told me in the past that service in my area is not very good and they don’t know when or if they will fix it).
  3. Buy a DVR on Ebay and see if DirecTV will support it to avoid the 2-year contract? These are supposedly “lease-only” units, so this may also not be a practical option.
  4. Accept the new DirecTV DVR with all the limitations and 2-year contract (What do I do then, if this new DVR really is unusable?)

I guess we customers are just not supposed to actually like the services we pay for — Cell phone, landline, cable TV, Internet service. And now Satellite TV too. Maybe they get their jollies by showing that we suckers will continue to subscribe to their crappy services, no matter how much they screw us over.


Posted on : Dec 19 2007
Tags: ,
Posted under tv |

DirecTV loses 10 million subscribers

Well, that’s my headline for sometime in the next 12-18 months, or whenever Rupert forces his Tivo owners to switch to his “new” DVR.

Here’s what I’m expecting so far, based on all I’ve read about the DVR DirecTV is going to shove down our throats:

1. No more “peanut” remote. It sounds trivial, but that remote is very comfortable. If you haven’t used it, you can’t relate. And the new DirecTV remote supposedly doesn’t control the on/off or volume on many makes/models of TVs, so you you end up needing two remotes.

2. No multiple live buffer streams to select between. With TiVo DirecTV units we can jump back and forth between two live programs, with buffer. Supposedly not so with the new DVRs.

3. GUI sucks. Comments include “hard to navigate” “a whole new horror” “not intuitive at all” “It BLOWS” “It is a fancy VCR, but not a Tivo” “amazingly difficult to use” “All the software people should be fired” See examples here.

4. Lease-only going forward, means higher monthly fees.

The tech support line apparently has an automated voice that tells you “most problems are resolved by rebooting.” What does that tell you about the quality of the software (and DirecTV’s contempt for their customers).

I’ve been a DirecTV subscriber for over 10 years. When DirecTV abandons all support for TiVo it looks like I’ll be stuck switching to cable (which totally sucks around here). Apparently I won’t be alone. Nobody that’s used TiVo for more than a few months is ever going to move as far backwards as DirecTV is trying to send us. It’s looking like it will be a mass exodus. What an effective way to take perfectly happy customers and send them straight to your competitors.


Posted on : Feb 20 2006
Tags: ,
Posted under tv |

News Corp Screws TiVo

A lot of us feared this would happen. DirecTV officially dropped TiVo. News Corp, the parent company, owns a firm that has their own DVR, so that’s what DirecTV is getting stuck with. Of course it is going to be garbage compared to TiVo, but it doesn’t matter. Users will be stuck with it just the same. According to the LA Times, two-thirds of Tivo’s 3.3 million subscribers are from DirecTV and 77% of TiVo’s new subscribers are coming from DirecTV.

As I mentioned when News Corp first acquired DirecTV, this is not unexpected. For my part, I’d say it’s bad news for us DirectTV subscribers. Cable (Comcast) where I live is awful, so my options are limited and I have no idea what my TV experience is going to be like in the next few years as our TiVos start to die off (or be killed by DirecTV).


Posted on : Aug 12 2005
Tags: ,
Posted under tv |

News Corp buys DirecTV

News Corp is the parent of Fox and yesterday the FCC and DoJ gave their stamp of approval to the $6.6 billion takeover deal. As a DirecTV and TiVo subscriber, I have a very bad feeling about this. I have no idea how they will mess this up, but in my experience, when Rupert Murdoch’s Fox moves in, things tend to get stupid.


Posted on : Dec 20 2003
Tags: ,
Posted under tv |
PhoneGnome
FREE calling
VoIP for the rest of us!