<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More unconventional video wisdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2009/03/31/680/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2009/03/31/680/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2009/03/31/680/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.org/?p=680#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tsahi.

More people will agree with you than me, so you&#039;re in the majority. :)

To your one comment, that &quot;video without good audio isn’t worth a thing&quot; I agree in the context of a &quot;video call&quot; but I will also say that there are some very interesting uses of video alone (with no audio at all), such as always-on streams for presence awareness, shared context, to support opportunistic collaboration and spontaneous (unplanned) interaction etc.  These uses of video without any audio have proven to be of more benefit than &quot;video calls&quot; but are rarely used because it isn&#039;t as &quot;sexy&quot; - conventional wisdom says &quot;video calls&quot; are the &quot;proper&quot; use of video.

I&#039;m happy that you find &quot;video calls&quot; useful - I don&#039;t - and neither does objective research - but as I state, that&#039;s okay, as your view is much more accepted than mine. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tsahi.</p>
<p>More people will agree with you than me, so you&#8217;re in the majority. <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To your one comment, that &#8220;video without good audio isn’t worth a thing&#8221; I agree in the context of a &#8220;video call&#8221; but I will also say that there are some very interesting uses of video alone (with no audio at all), such as always-on streams for presence awareness, shared context, to support opportunistic collaboration and spontaneous (unplanned) interaction etc.  These uses of video without any audio have proven to be of more benefit than &#8220;video calls&#8221; but are rarely used because it isn&#8217;t as &#8220;sexy&#8221; &#8211; conventional wisdom says &#8220;video calls&#8221; are the &#8220;proper&#8221; use of video.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy that you find &#8220;video calls&#8221; useful &#8211; I don&#8217;t &#8211; and neither does objective research &#8211; but as I state, that&#8217;s okay, as your view is much more accepted than mine. <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsahi Levent-Levi</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2009/03/31/680/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>Tsahi Levent-Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.org/?p=680#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Mr Blog,
Thanks for the thoughtful post.
I first want to state that video without good audio isn&#039;t worth a thing - video is supplementary on top of audio.
I also would like to state that I have never hidden the fact that I am a RADVISION employee (for the last 10 years).
That said, I can only state things out of my own personal experience:
* I tend to find video calling useful
* I wouldn&#039;t replace ALL of my voice calls with video calls, but I will replace some of them, depending on the situation.
* I wouldn&#039;t replace all face-to-face meetings with video - I have made that clear already in the same post you quote me from.

I agree with you on most accounts, but I do believe that video will gain a lot of ground in the next 2 years - a lot more than in the previous 10.

Tsahi Levent-Levi
RADVISION</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Blog,<br />
Thanks for the thoughtful post.<br />
I first want to state that video without good audio isn&#8217;t worth a thing &#8211; video is supplementary on top of audio.<br />
I also would like to state that I have never hidden the fact that I am a RADVISION employee (for the last 10 years).<br />
That said, I can only state things out of my own personal experience:<br />
* I tend to find video calling useful<br />
* I wouldn&#8217;t replace ALL of my voice calls with video calls, but I will replace some of them, depending on the situation.<br />
* I wouldn&#8217;t replace all face-to-face meetings with video &#8211; I have made that clear already in the same post you quote me from.</p>
<p>I agree with you on most accounts, but I do believe that video will gain a lot of ground in the next 2 years &#8211; a lot more than in the previous 10.</p>
<p>Tsahi Levent-Levi<br />
RADVISION</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

