<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlimited wireless &#8211; Helio&#8217;s swan song?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2008/02/29/unlimited-wireless-helios-swan-song/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2008/02/29/unlimited-wireless-helios-swan-song/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2008/02/29/unlimited-wireless-helios-swan-song/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 03:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=382#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Shai: the thing that these are hybrid satellite/terrestrial networks. the device do not ever have to connect to the satellite; but it will be there for an emergency. what makes it interesting is that these companies got prime spectrum at rock bottom price by purchasing &#039;satellite&#039; spectrum and than applying for permision to reuse the saem frequencies on the ground for there hybrid networks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i aggree that there is no future in mass market devices that communicate via satellite. but that may end up just be a technicallity for these services.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shai: the thing that these are hybrid satellite/terrestrial networks. the device do not ever have to connect to the satellite; but it will be there for an emergency. what makes it interesting is that these companies got prime spectrum at rock bottom price by purchasing &#8216;satellite&#8217; spectrum and than applying for permision to reuse the saem frequencies on the ground for there hybrid networks.</p>
<p>i aggree that there is no future in mass market devices that communicate via satellite. but that may end up just be a technicallity for these services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Berger</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2008/02/29/unlimited-wireless-helios-swan-song/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=382#comment-842</guid>
		<description>David: I agree that a true wholesale wireless provider (I called it &quot;naked carrier&quot; in a recent blog post) could be a successful. Focus on the infrastructure and let a bunch MVNO&#039;s battle it out on the marketing front. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I remember when you and I walked by the Helio retail outlet in Palo Alto: Empty. (Meanwhile a few doors down, the Apple store was lively.) That was a telling moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom: I&#039;m skeptical of satellite based phone/data service because of the latency factor. And I can&#039;t put much stock in anyone saying their &quot;planning a 4G network&quot; given that no one has defined what that means.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: I agree that a true wholesale wireless provider (I called it &quot;naked carrier&quot; in a recent blog post) could be a successful. Focus on the infrastructure and let a bunch MVNO&#8217;s battle it out on the marketing front. </p>
<p>I remember when you and I walked by the Helio retail outlet in Palo Alto: Empty. (Meanwhile a few doors down, the Apple store was lively.) That was a telling moment.</p>
<p>Tom: I&#8217;m skeptical of satellite based phone/data service because of the latency factor. And I can&#8217;t put much stock in anyone saying their &quot;planning a 4G network&quot; given that no one has defined what that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2008/02/29/unlimited-wireless-helios-swan-song/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=382#comment-841</guid>
		<description>this year and over the next couple of years ICO, terrestar, and MSV will all be rolloinf out hybrid satellite/cellular networks. i have a feeling these arte going to turn out to be more cellular than satellite. the whole satellite phone industry is a bit of a failure beyond vertical markets. but the next generation of phone will be the size and weight of cellular devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so why is tjis significant. at least two of the three enities above plan to operate on a &#039;wholesale&#039; model selling network capicty to other who will handle the retail end. all three of the above companies are planning 4G networks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
they may all end up in bankruptcy. but the satellite are under construction and likely to be launched. i would keep an eye on these three companies as cataysts toward a wholesale voice/data network model. although i do expect that they will be focused on government, industrial, and vertical markets initially. but a connection with a consumer based retail partner is not at all out of the question.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this year and over the next couple of years ICO, terrestar, and MSV will all be rolloinf out hybrid satellite/cellular networks. i have a feeling these arte going to turn out to be more cellular than satellite. the whole satellite phone industry is a bit of a failure beyond vertical markets. but the next generation of phone will be the size and weight of cellular devices. </p>
<p>so why is tjis significant. at least two of the three enities above plan to operate on a &#8216;wholesale&#8217; model selling network capicty to other who will handle the retail end. all three of the above companies are planning 4G networks.</p>
<p>they may all end up in bankruptcy. but the satellite are under construction and likely to be launched. i would keep an eye on these three companies as cataysts toward a wholesale voice/data network model. although i do expect that they will be focused on government, industrial, and vertical markets initially. but a connection with a consumer based retail partner is not at all out of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

