<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is SIPphone excluded from FCC E911 Order?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: naser isaa</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>naser isaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=334#comment-733</guid>
		<description>hi
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=334#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I get that Moshe.  I understand why people may want it.  The problem is the FCC seems to want to ensure nobody is allowed to offer it, but SIPphone still does, so I want to understand their legal basis for doing so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that Moshe.  I understand why people may want it.  The problem is the FCC seems to want to ensure nobody is allowed to offer it, but SIPphone still does, so I want to understand their legal basis for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Maeir</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Maeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=334#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Dave,&lt;br /&gt;
Many customers who use VoIP may want 911, until they find out they have to pay an extra dollar or two a month...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
Many customers who use VoIP may want 911, until they find out they have to pay an extra dollar or two a month&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank sandereson</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>frank sandereson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=334#comment-730</guid>
		<description>in the UK ofcom has issued a new consultation on 999 (Uk equiv of 911) that says any service that allows connection to or from pstn numbers MUST offer 999. that will now include skype and every other pc based voip service that has tried to avoid being captured by 999/911.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the UK ofcom has issued a new consultation on 999 (Uk equiv of 911) that says any service that allows connection to or from pstn numbers MUST offer 999. that will now include skype and every other pc based voip service that has tried to avoid being captured by 999/911.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luca</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/24/why-is-sipphone-excluded-from-fcc-e911-order/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=334#comment-729</guid>
		<description>In Italy you just need to claim that your service is not intended as &quot;primary&quot; telephony service. It&#039;s not that simple actually, but it explains what happens here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Italy you just need to claim that your service is not intended as &quot;primary&quot; telephony service. It&#8217;s not that simple actually, but it explains what happens here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

