<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another thing I don&#8217;t understand &#8211; Youtube exuberance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2007/08/04/another-thing-i-dont-understand-youtube-exuberance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/04/another-thing-i-dont-understand-youtube-exuberance/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:07:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/04/another-thing-i-dont-understand-youtube-exuberance/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 06:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=327#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Interesting site, James. The videos certainly look to be better quality than Youtube in most cases, but still not even &quot;standard def&quot; TV.  For example, typical seems to be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  Stream #0.0: Video: mpeg4, yuv420p, 336x256, 29.97 fps(r)&lt;br /&gt;
  Stream #0.1: Audio: mp3, 32000 Hz, stereo, 80 kb/s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(About half standard def TV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mim: Yeah, as I said, I get the &quot;YOU&quot; thing, but even so, any plain consumer cheap video camera records in (at least) standard def TV quality, approx 500x500 30 frames per second. You don&#039;t need studio quality equipment or big bucks for that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting site, James. The videos certainly look to be better quality than Youtube in most cases, but still not even &quot;standard def&quot; TV.  For example, typical seems to be:</p>
<p>  Stream #0.0: Video: mpeg4, yuv420p, 336&#215;256, 29.97 fps(r)<br />
  Stream #0.1: Audio: mp3, 32000 Hz, stereo, 80 kb/s</p>
<p>(About half standard def TV)</p>
<p>Mim: Yeah, as I said, I get the &quot;YOU&quot; thing, but even so, any plain consumer cheap video camera records in (at least) standard def TV quality, approx 500&#215;500 30 frames per second. You don&#8217;t need studio quality equipment or big bucks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Seng</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/04/another-thing-i-dont-understand-youtube-exuberance/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>James Seng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=327#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Try http://stage6.divx.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try <a href="http://stage6.divx.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stage6.divx.com/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mim song</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2007/08/04/another-thing-i-dont-understand-youtube-exuberance/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>mim song</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=327#comment-713</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;s a case of &quot;video&quot; diverging into 2 media.  one is &quot;professional&quot;, market-oriented, etc., and the other is &quot;confessional&quot;, personal, etc.  as the technical capabilities of the former are out of reach of the creators of the latter, there&#039;s no way they can inhabit the same ecological niche.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s a case of &quot;video&quot; diverging into 2 media.  one is &quot;professional&quot;, market-oriented, etc., and the other is &quot;confessional&quot;, personal, etc.  as the technical capabilities of the former are out of reach of the creators of the latter, there&#8217;s no way they can inhabit the same ecological niche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
