<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality &#8212; unnecessary net regulation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2006/03/20/net-neutrality-unnecessary-net-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2006/03/20/net-neutrality-unnecessary-net-regulation/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldhats</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2006/03/20/net-neutrality-unnecessary-net-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>oldhats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=224#comment-547</guid>
		<description>your point is well made and well taken...i have a question though:  it seems to me that even if the average consumer didn&#039;t notice a &quot;limitation&quot; to their service, at least a few savvy consumers would.  in addition to the screaming they would do, the FCC already has the authority to intervene.  so why new congressional regulation?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your point is well made and well taken&#8230;i have a question though:  it seems to me that even if the average consumer didn&#8217;t notice a &quot;limitation&quot; to their service, at least a few savvy consumers would.  in addition to the screaming they would do, the FCC already has the authority to intervene.  so why new congressional regulation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2006/03/20/net-neutrality-unnecessary-net-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=224#comment-546</guid>
		<description>My point is if the first mile access providers decide what apps see the light of day though subtle disruption, how would you know?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You say consumers would be appalled.  Except they aren&#039;t, in real life.  It&#039;s been happening for 75 years (or more) in the telco world and nobody seems to care.  The telco decides what apps see the light of day.  And guess what, there have been darned few of them, right? Consumers don&#039;t become appalled about what they don&#039;t know they&#039;re missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that anyone could put up anything and the market decides is what gave us the amazing innovations we&#039;ve seen on the net, much of it in the last 10 years.  All those ideas flowing to end-users, and end-users shifting to newer and better apps all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If new apps don&#039;t work because the first mile access providers are messing with them, who is going to know the underlying reason? The app won&#039;t work, so nobody is going to use it, so the app will die off before anybody really even knows about it. The end-users will never see the app, so they won&#039;t have anything to be appalled about.  Their 2006 version of the internet will still work, so they won&#039;t even notice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is if the first mile access providers decide what apps see the light of day though subtle disruption, how would you know?</p>
<p>You say consumers would be appalled.  Except they aren&#8217;t, in real life.  It&#8217;s been happening for 75 years (or more) in the telco world and nobody seems to care.  The telco decides what apps see the light of day.  And guess what, there have been darned few of them, right? Consumers don&#8217;t become appalled about what they don&#8217;t know they&#8217;re missing.</p>
<p>The fact that anyone could put up anything and the market decides is what gave us the amazing innovations we&#8217;ve seen on the net, much of it in the last 10 years.  All those ideas flowing to end-users, and end-users shifting to newer and better apps all the time.</p>
<p>If new apps don&#8217;t work because the first mile access providers are messing with them, who is going to know the underlying reason? The app won&#8217;t work, so nobody is going to use it, so the app will die off before anybody really even knows about it. The end-users will never see the app, so they won&#8217;t have anything to be appalled about.  Their 2006 version of the internet will still work, so they won&#8217;t even notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keeperfree</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2006/03/20/net-neutrality-unnecessary-net-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>keeperfree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=224#comment-545</guid>
		<description>You mention the thought of Internet cos. determining which sites will see the light of day.  Given that the very idea of this is appalling to consumers, why should we think that companies would be so eager to make it reallity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 If government decides to intervene, the Internet is suddenly succeptible to a bevy of special interests.  Wther or not these interests seek to stifle innovation is a crap shoot, and not a chance that I am willing to take without ample evidence that our fears of gatekeeper monopolies are coming true.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention the thought of Internet cos. determining which sites will see the light of day.  Given that the very idea of this is appalling to consumers, why should we think that companies would be so eager to make it reallity.</p>
<p> If government decides to intervene, the Internet is suddenly succeptible to a bevy of special interests.  Wther or not these interests seek to stifle innovation is a crap shoot, and not a chance that I am willing to take without ample evidence that our fears of gatekeeper monopolies are coming true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

