<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype and ENUM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2005/04/24/skype-and-enum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2005/04/24/skype-and-enum/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:49:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wolff</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2005/04/24/skype-and-enum/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 08:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=193#comment-460</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a skype api, so i suspect niklas is cool with variations on callto:. btw, callto preceded skype; it was used by other systems first.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a skype api, so i suspect niklas is cool with variations on callto:. btw, callto preceded skype; it was used by other systems first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2005/04/24/skype-and-enum/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=193#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yep. I agree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My understanding is that (so far) Skype has taken the position that interop, and specifically SIP gateways, offer no value to Skype.  Unless there are a lot of users on SIP, that are also using ENUM and have pure IP interop, Skype will see no pressure to interop with SIP.  And their closed system makes deployment of a gateway by third parties challenging.  So it doesn&#039;t look like we&#039;ll see SIP to Skype or Skype to SIP gateways any tme soon, if ever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SIP is reminding me of UNIX in the early days, where vendors all did things their own ways and there was very little network effect.  SIP is happenign the same way.  Very few services offer direct IP-based interconnect, especially at the phone number level, dialing ordinary numbers (who wants to hit a &quot;*xxx select code&quot; for every call).  In fact, is there *any* ENUM-based phone number SIP IP peering between providers today?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Yep. I agree.</p>
<p>My understanding is that (so far) Skype has taken the position that interop, and specifically SIP gateways, offer no value to Skype.  Unless there are a lot of users on SIP, that are also using ENUM and have pure IP interop, Skype will see no pressure to interop with SIP.  And their closed system makes deployment of a gateway by third parties challenging.  So it doesn&#8217;t look like we&#8217;ll see SIP to Skype or Skype to SIP gateways any tme soon, if ever.</p>
<p>SIP is reminding me of UNIX in the early days, where vendors all did things their own ways and there was very little network effect.  SIP is happenign the same way.  Very few services offer direct IP-based interconnect, especially at the phone number level, dialing ordinary numbers (who wants to hit a &quot;*xxx select code&quot; for every call).  In fact, is there *any* ENUM-based phone number SIP IP peering between providers today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2005/04/24/skype-and-enum/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=193#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Hi David,&lt;br /&gt;
1. it works on the Mac too ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
2.It is true that your average brand VOIP phone cannot use it, but these also cannot use ENUM either (beside the SNOM or the IX66). These VoIP phones require the ENUM query to be done by the SIP server and here a SIP-Skype gateway is needed, not out of imagination ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
3. This is not really a &quot;hack&quot;, it is experimental and according to RFC 3761 ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
4. Why not call directly on skype? Why not use the SIP URI for calling a SIP user? Same reason. In addition, if you enter a phone number and the called party is also on Skype, you get a short-cut ;-) We will see how bellheadish Niklas will be on this by-pass to Skype-Out ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
5. One additional idea is of course to HAVE SIP-Skype gateways, especially for the PSTN-SIP-ENUM gateways.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,<br />
1. it works on the Mac too <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
2.It is true that your average brand VOIP phone cannot use it, but these also cannot use ENUM either (beside the SNOM or the IX66). These VoIP phones require the ENUM query to be done by the SIP server and here a SIP-Skype gateway is needed, not out of imagination <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
3. This is not really a &quot;hack&quot;, it is experimental and according to RFC 3761 <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
4. Why not call directly on skype? Why not use the SIP URI for calling a SIP user? Same reason. In addition, if you enter a phone number and the called party is also on Skype, you get a short-cut <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  We will see how bellheadish Niklas will be on this by-pass to Skype-Out <img src='http://mrblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
5. One additional idea is of course to HAVE SIP-Skype gateways, especially for the PSTN-SIP-ENUM gateways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
