Comments on: GNUP Me? Not! http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/ Mr Blog. Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd. Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:31:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: James Seng http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/comment-page-1/#comment-379 James Seng Thu, 25 Nov 2004 03:51:15 +0000 http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=178#comment-379 yep, i have no idea what GNUP is either. and since it is not able to make it clear to me on the front page, i dont think it is worthwhile to figure it out anyway. yep, i have no idea what GNUP is either. and since it is not able to make it clear to me on the front page, i dont think it is worthwhile to figure it out anyway.

]]> By: MrBlog http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/comment-page-1/#comment-378 MrBlog Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:06:06 +0000 http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=178#comment-378 That 'applications' page is exactly the kind of non-information information I'm talking about. It leaves one asking more questions.<br /> <br /> I have a SIP phone. What can I do with my GNUP number?<br /> <br /> Is there a DNS root I can query for NAPTR records?<br /> <br /> Etc. That ‘applications’ page is exactly the kind of non-information information I’m talking about. It leaves one asking more questions.

I have a SIP phone. What can I do with my GNUP number?

Is there a DNS root I can query for NAPTR records?

Etc.

]]> By: chris holland http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/comment-page-1/#comment-377 chris holland Wed, 24 Nov 2004 05:47:59 +0000 http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=178#comment-377 I don't if you've already seen this, but just in case, this *might* shed *some* light:<br /> <br /> http://www.gnup.org/applications.html<br /> <br /> What I'm taking from these diagrams is that they're looking at every communication protocol out there and attempting to graft GNUP on-top of it, with GNUP gateways all over the place.<br /> <br /> blech ... ? I don’t if you’ve already seen this, but just in case, this *might* shed *some* light:

http://www.gnup.org/applications.html

What I’m taking from these diagrams is that they’re looking at every communication protocol out there and attempting to graft GNUP on-top of it, with GNUP gateways all over the place.

blech … ?

]]> By: Srdjan http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/comment-page-1/#comment-376 Srdjan Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:31:23 +0000 http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=178#comment-376 Amen! Amen!

]]> By: chris holland http://mrblog.org/2004/11/23/gnup-me-not/comment-page-1/#comment-375 chris holland Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:22:41 +0000 http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=178#comment-375 ugh, i've been scratching my head about them in a few blog entries:<br /> <br /> http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-dundi-peerio_20.html<br /> <br /> http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-numbering.html<br /> <br /> This all seems somewhat silly to me. I know we're all trying real hard to live our lives around numbers just so we can accommodate 100-year old user interfaces, but i'm just hoping we'll evolve to the next century ... here's a related rant:<br /> <br /> http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-numbers-are-so-1849.html<br /> <br /> ... with more discussing going on here:<br /> <br /> http://voipandenum.blogspot.com/2004/10/enum-numbers-and-uris-voip-and-pstn-or.html ugh, i’ve been scratching my head about them in a few blog entries:

http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-dundi-peerio_20.html

http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-numbering.html

This all seems somewhat silly to me. I know we’re all trying real hard to live our lives around numbers just so we can accommodate 100-year old user interfaces, but i’m just hoping we’ll evolve to the next century … here’s a related rant:

http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/2004/10/voip-numbers-are-so-1849.html

… with more discussing going on here:

http://voipandenum.blogspot.com/2004/10/enum-numbers-and-uris-voip-and-pstn-or.html

]]>