<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why AT&amp;T, Quest, etc. VoIP announcements are lame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/</link>
	<description>Mr Blog.  Very technical, or silly, sometimes absurd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:07:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Phone Service Provider</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Phone Service Provider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-225</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article about VOIP.  I have been looking for a VoIP Phone Service Provider and found one at &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.voovox.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article about VOIP.  I have been looking for a VoIP Phone Service Provider and found one at <br />
<a href="http://www.voovox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voovox.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I believe that&#039;s QWEST. Spelling aside, what&#039;s your point?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that&#8217;s QWEST. Spelling aside, what&#8217;s your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuezeng Cao (Jack)</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>yuezeng Cao (Jack)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-223</guid>
		<description>This is a very good introduction to VoIP mode which can be operated as a business mode by Service Providers, not just as a free voice game on Internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this mode is retrieved from considerations by larger Carriers like AT&amp;T, would any warmth friend would like to outline an VoIP business mode for Small and Medium Enterprice to operate (enter)in an opening telecom market like in China?    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a complete VoIP solution, we would find business opportunity in this huge market together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks with Regards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jack, yuezeng Cao&lt;br /&gt;
contact me: yuezeng_cao@hotmail.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good introduction to VoIP mode which can be operated as a business mode by Service Providers, not just as a free voice game on Internet. </p>
<p>But this mode is retrieved from considerations by larger Carriers like AT&#038;T, would any warmth friend would like to outline an VoIP business mode for Small and Medium Enterprice to operate (enter)in an opening telecom market like in China?    </p>
<p>With a complete VoIP solution, we would find business opportunity in this huge market together. </p>
<p>Thanks with Regards</p>
<p>Jack, yuezeng Cao<br />
contact me: <a href="mailto:yuezeng_cao@hotmail.com">yuezeng_cao@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISolveSystems</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>ISolveSystems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I would like to invite you to blog and participate in VoIP forum and share the advertising revenue that we are making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please find out more here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://isolvesystems.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://isolvesystems.com/discussions/phpBB2/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to invite you to blog and participate in VoIP forum and share the advertising revenue that we are making.</p>
<p>Please find out more here:</p>
<p><a href="http://isolvesystems.com" rel="nofollow">http://isolvesystems.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://isolvesystems.com/discussions/phpBB2/" rel="nofollow">http://isolvesystems.com/discussions/phpBB2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISolveSystems</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>ISolveSystems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Currently, routing VoIP call over the internet is by best effort. There is no SLA. QoS is not enabled on the Internet. MPLS development will help VoIP development.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, routing VoIP call over the internet is by best effort. There is no SLA. QoS is not enabled on the Internet. MPLS development will help VoIP development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Hotels Motels</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Hotels Motels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Well, Overall.. AT&amp;T and Qwest are th eworst providers in the Phx area
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Overall.. AT&#038;T and Qwest are th eworst providers in the Phx area</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ven</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-219</guid>
		<description>It will be a matter of time before PSTN is removed and Internet to Internet peering for VoIP is established. However, the internet QoS (Quality of Service) needs to improve a lot more.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a matter of time before PSTN is removed and Internet to Internet peering for VoIP is established. However, the internet QoS (Quality of Service) needs to improve a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed at Phone Service .com</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>ed at Phone Service .com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-218</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that ATT is really just trying to capitalize on what vonage is &quot;more like&quot;.  Of course neither are true internet phone service, but ATT is just using the term internet to associate itself with vonage&#039;s increasing market share.  We sell the neighborhood, which does not use any of that marketing hype, even though it is quasi VOIP, using the internet to route traffic to the closest receiving Central Office.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that ATT is really just trying to capitalize on what vonage is &quot;more like&quot;.  Of course neither are true internet phone service, but ATT is just using the term internet to associate itself with vonage&#8217;s increasing market share.  We sell the neighborhood, which does not use any of that marketing hype, even though it is quasi VOIP, using the internet to route traffic to the closest receiving Central Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrBlog</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>MrBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Actually you&#039;re right. At one time Vonage supported incoming calls via SIP  but I don&#039;t believe they support it anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mostly singled out AT&amp;T, Quest, and the others mentioned because they are the ones making all the headlines in the mainstream press over the past week or so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, you&#039;re right, though, and there are other VoIP providers in the mix with similar shortcomings.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually you&#8217;re right. At one time Vonage supported incoming calls via SIP  but I don&#8217;t believe they support it anymore.</p>
<p>I mostly singled out AT&#038;T, Quest, and the others mentioned because they are the ones making all the headlines in the mainstream press over the past week or so.</p>
<p>In fact, you&#8217;re right, though, and there are other VoIP providers in the mix with similar shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://mrblog.org/2003/12/11/why-att-quest-etc-voip-announcements-are-lame/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrblog.televolution.net/?p=105#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I would like to clarify whether you distinguish VoIP offering from AT&amp;T and Vonage. For example, Vonage also does not interface with other VoIP providers in the native mode. So why single out only these service providers?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to clarify whether you distinguish VoIP offering from AT&#038;T and Vonage. For example, Vonage also does not interface with other VoIP providers in the native mode. So why single out only these service providers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
